Chrome - 1958 1959 Ford Thunderbird Rear View Mirror W/ Bracket & Screws on 2040-parts.com
Van Nuys, California, United States
|
BRAND NEW in the box!! Didn't end up using on my project.
* CHROME Rear View Mirror w/ Stem * CHROME Bracket Assembly * CHROME Mounting Screws This is a beautiful reproduction purchased from Concours Parts & Accessories. Cost more than $50 new. + Includes FREE SHIPPING in the US Need to replace your worn out, ugly mirror?? |
Mirrors for Sale
Vintage rear view mirror bracket '55-57 chevrolet pt # 4648652(US $14.95)
Vintage ford rear view mirror day/night glare proof fomoco(US $50.00)
(#2216) rear view mirror 1957 chevrolet (used)(US $19.00)
1964 chevy chevelle malibu ss rear view mirror(US $40.00)
1965 -66 ford mustang parking light housings(US $39.99)
Vintage nos monarch rear view mirror rat rod hot rod mopar ford chevy
BMW: Don't fear the stop/start system in the 2012 3-series
Fri, 14 Oct 2011BMW is taking a calculated risk by installing an automatic stop/start system on its best seller, the 3-series, for 2012. But company brass is optimistic that American consumers will adjust to the relatively foreign technology. "Many customers will enjoy the car very quickly," said BMW board member Ian Robertson, who oversees sales and marketing.
2014 Jeep Cherokees finally en route to dealerships
Mon, 21 Oct 2013Car haulers loaded with 2014 Jeep Cherokee stick out on the flat farmland like elephants on the savannah -- lumbering behemoths easy to spot, even from miles away. In ones and twos they rumble the 15 miles west from Chrysler Group's massive Toledo, Ohio, assembly complex toward a former supplier-owned automotive testing center. The Cherokees were due in dealerships almost two months ago but have been held while Chrysler developed and installed new software to smooth out the way the engine, nine-speed transmission and innovative disconnecting drivetrain interact.
Toyota GT86 TV Advert BANNED
Thu, 15 Nov 2012The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has banned a TV advert for the Toyota GT86 because it encouraged motorists to drive irresponsibly. But it seems the advert would “encourage motorists to drive irresponsibly” and “…was irresponsible and condoned dangerous driving”. Or at least it would according to the ASA, which made the ruling after being inundated with complaints about Toyota encouraging drivers to speed and be reckless.