Find or Sell any Parts for Your Vehicle in USA

1973-1974 Charger & Roadrunner Dual Exhaust System, Aluminized With 440 Engines on 2040-parts.com

US $490.00
Location:

Geneva, Ohio, United States

Geneva, Ohio, United States
Condition:New Surface Finish:ALUMINIZED

 1973-1974 DODGE CHARGER & PLYMOUTH ROADRUNNER DUAL EXHAUST SYSTEM, ALUMINIZED WITH 440 ENGINES

  • INCLUDED IN THE KIT ARE:
  • LEFT & RIGHT EXHAUST PIPES
  • LEFT & RIGHT MUFFLERS
  • LEFT & RIGHT TAILPIPES


On Mar-16-12 at 10:54:18 PDT, seller added the following information:


SHIPPING TO ALASKA, HAWAII AND PUERTO RICO IS NOT INCLUDED IN SHIPPING COST. PLEASE CONTACT US FOR RATES


THERE ARE ADDITIONAL SHIPPING CHARGES TO ALASKA, HAWAII AND PUERTO RICO. PLEASE CONTACT US FOR RATES

Video: Chip Foose talks about, renders his first VW Golf

Thu, 19 Jan 2012

In order to promote the launch of the Golf R in the US, Volkswagen has created a series of videos featuring fans of the iconic Euro hatch for a new iPad app. Here Chip Foose, founder of Foose Design and presenter of hit TV show, Overhaulin', tells the story of his first VW Golf, a 1985 GTI. But the highlight of the video is watching Foose produce a marker rendering of the MkII GTI in his own distinct style, usually associated with the hotrod scene.

The Extreme Mini Adventure Money Can’t Buy

Wed, 30 Apr 2014

IT’S NOT every day as an apprentice you get to build a new concept car for your employer. However that’s exactly what a lucky few trainees did when BMW tasked them to make their design study a reality. Choosing the firm’s Mini Paceman as the donor car, the talented apprentices transformed the vehicle into a rugged two-door pick-up – a long way from the original motor’s sleek coupe origins.

Contests Archive: CDN-GM Interactive Design Competition 2011

Thu, 15 Mar 2012

The Car Design News - GM Interactive Design Competition was open to design students across the USA and Canada. This was an open, online competition, which was held in the spirit of the web, where data and information are shared and exchanged with ease, and where people could come together to collaborate.  In this spirit, the judges were looking to see the contribution the entrants made within the wider online community and how they helped their competition peers. We advised students to engage in dialogue with those who commented on their work, and where they made changes to their design based on feedback they received to illustrate how and why this is so.