Find or Sell any Parts for Your Vehicle in USA

Racequip Harness Seat Belts 4-pt V-type Bolt-in Red Cage Mount Sfi 16.1 #713013 on 2040-parts.com

US $85.09
Location:

Orlando, Florida, United States

Orlando, Florida, United States
RACEQUIP HARNESS SEAT BELTS 4-PT V-TYPE BOLT-IN RED CAGE MOUNT SFI 16.1  #713013, US $85.09, image 1
Condition:New other (see details) Manufacturer Part Number:RQP713013 Surface Finish:RED Part Brand:RACEQUIP Brand:RaceQuip

RACEQUIP  4 POINT 3" BELT SYSTEM WRAP AROUND OR BOLT IN SYSTEM 

  • RACEQUIP
  • P/N#713013
  • RED
  • 4-POINT
  • V-TYPE SINGLE MOUNT/ ROLL CAGE MOUNT
  • LATCH & LINK SYSTEM
  • SHOULDER BELTS ADJUST 26" TO 40"
  • LAP BELT ADJUST 20" TO 60"
  • 3" SHOULDER BELTS
  • 2" CROTCH / SUB BELT
  • SFI 16.1 CERTIFIED
  • PULL DOWN

Actual shipping charges and combined shipping. Canada & International shipping Extra.And additional time maybe needed to ship. Accepting Paypal. All sales final, as is race item.

Check out my other items! Be sure to add me to your favorites list!

Los Angeles auto show 2010: news, blogs, galleries

Thu, 18 Nov 2010

5.37pm: That's all folksIt speaks volumes that the LA show is over so quickly. This is a very compact show compared to the world's larger auto expos. More news to follow in separate articles, and we'll have a new analysis piece on the LA show 2010 in the morning.

Mercedes-Benz starts voluntary recall of 2013 SL-class

Tue, 09 Oct 2012

Mercedes-Benz has initiated a voluntary recall for its 2013 SL-class due to an issue with the air-conditioning system. Under “worst-case condition” testing during a severe front impact, a rupture of the refrigerant line is possible, which could cause a fire in the engine compartment. According to the report from Mercedes Benz, the refrigerant does not ignite under normal conditions.

U-turn for wheelchair row taxi firm

Tue, 14 Jan 2014

A TAXI firm that refused to pick up wheelchair users has had to perform a U-turn. Middlesbrough-based Boro Cars, the largest taxi firm in the North East, had originally said refusing disabled passengers was "morally wrong", but it brought in the policy anyway. The firm insists that minibuses cost drivers more to rent and that the standard fares, which are the only fares that can be charged to disabled passengers, are not high enough to earn operators any money.